2006年8月17日

一直有留意Firefox对IE的冲击,不过以前用IE也并没觉得有什么大问题,就一直用下来。

直到最近的IE老出问题,公司派的本本装的是win2000,用久了里面的IE经常会弹出一个crash的对话框(似乎在XP里就很少见),然后所有打开的IE窗口都只能关闭,解决无方,于是想到了Firefox,试用一下,第一感觉是非常快,不管是load firefox还是打开新的网页,基本上都是文字刷一下就出来,图片则延迟了点,不过还是比IE做得好:) 很多小的细节都考虑得比较符合用户的操作习惯,比如工具栏有一个下载的管理器,管理最近下载的咚咚,不用第三方软件,而且Firefox比IE小巧多了(4.8M),Simple is beautiful,呵呵,I like it.
posted @ 2006-08-20 23:26 响 阅读(159) | 评论 (1)编辑 收藏
 

Q If Java uses the pass-by reference, why won't a swap function work?

AYour question demonstrates a common error made by Java language newcomers. Indeed, even seasoned veterans find it difficult to keep the terms straight.

Java does manipulate objects by reference, and all object variables are references. However, Java doesn't pass method arguments by reference; it passes them by value.

Take the badSwap() method for example:


public void badSwap(int var1, int var2)
{
  int temp = var1;
  var1 = var2;
  var2 = temp;
}

When badSwap() returns, the variables passed as arguments will still hold their original values. The method will also fail if we change the arguments type from int to Object, since Java passes object references by value as well.

Now, here is where it gets tricky:


public void tricky(Point arg1, Point arg2)
{
  arg1.x = 100;
  arg1.y = 100;

  Point temp = arg1;
  arg1 = arg2;
  arg2 = temp;
}

public static void main(String [] args)
{
  Point pnt1 = new Point(0,0);
  Point pnt2 = new Point(0,0);
  System.out.println("X: " + pnt1.x + " Y: " +pnt1.y);
  System.out.println("X: " + pnt2.x + " Y: " +pnt2.y);
  System.out.println(" ");
  tricky(pnt1,pnt2);
  System.out.println("X: " + pnt1.x + " Y:" + pnt1.y);
  System.out.println("X: " + pnt2.x + " Y: " +pnt2.y);  
}

If we execute this main() method, we see the following output:


X: 0 Y: 0
X: 0 Y: 0

X: 100 Y: 100
X: 0 Y: 0

The method successfully alters the value of pnt1, even though it is passed by value; however, a swap of pnt1 and pnt2 fails! This is the major source of confusion. In the main() method, pnt1 and pnt2 are nothing more than object references. When you pass pnt1 and pnt2 to the tricky() method, Java passes the references by value just like any other parameter. This means the references passed to the method are actually copies of the original references. Figure 1 below shows two references pointing to the same object after Java passes an object to a method.


Figure 1. After being passed to a method, an object will have at least two references

Java copies and passes the reference by value, not the object. Thus, method manipulation will alter the objects, since the references point to the original objects. But since the references are copies, swaps will fail. As Figure 2 illustrates, the method references swap, but not the original references. Unfortunately, after a method call, you are left with only the unswapped original references. For a swap to succeed outside of the method call, we need to swap the original references, not the copies.


Figure 2. Only the method references are swapped, not the original ones

O'Reilly's Java in a Nutshell by David Flanagan (see Resources) puts it best: "Java manipulates objects 'by reference,' but it passes object references to methods 'by value.'" As a result, you cannot write a standard swap method to swap objects.

Resources

posted @ 2006-08-17 22:00 响 阅读(288) | 评论 (0)编辑 收藏
 
http://www.physics.orst.edu/~rubin/nacphy/brian/socket.html
另外关于Java network的一些基础的教程:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/networking/index.html
posted @ 2006-08-17 10:01 响 阅读(693) | 评论 (0)编辑 收藏