有个标题
FWD: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/750902/how-do-i-get-rid-of-o-is-not-declared
I've found the answer on the .net forums. It contains a good explanation of why ASP.Net is acting the way it is:
[quote]
We have finally obtained reliable repro and identified the underlying issue. A trivial repro looks like this:
<% if (true) { %> <%=1%> <% } %> <%=2%>
In order to provide intellisense in <%= %> blocks at design time, ASP.NET generates assignment to a temporary __o variable and language (VB or C#) then provide the intellisense for the variable. That is done when page compiler sees the first <%= ... %> block. But here, the block is inside the if, so after the if closes, the variable goes out of scope. We end up generating something like this:
if (true) { object @__o; @__o = 1; } @__o = 2;
The workaround is to add a dummy expression early in the page. E.g. <%="" %>. This will not render anything, and it will make sure that __o is declared top level in the Render method, before any potential ‘if’ (or other scoping) statement.
[/quote]
An alternative solution is to simply use
<% response.write(var) %> instead of <%= var %> link|edit|
<% response.write(var) %>
instead of
<%= var %>
posted on 2011-03-16 16:16 游雯 阅读(129) 评论(0) 编辑 收藏 所属分类: .net编程技巧
Powered by: BlogJava Copyright © 游雯